Tuesday, June 2, 2009

E3 2009: Microsoft Conference

As you saw is the previous post (it’s MGS, so it gets a separate post. OK?) the conference was really great. Here are my impressions.

The conference had a bad start, I don’t care about The Beatles really. So, these were 15 minutes wasted from my life… Then came Tony Hawk, another waste… I am sure that other people like these things, I just don’t like them.

I wasn’t able to watch the Modern Warfare 2 gameplay that came next as my streaming video on IGN was interrupted and by the time I switched to Gamespot, it was over. I have been trying to see it again, but I failed. IGN is not working and the footage is so far not on any other site. So, I can’t comment. UPDATE: Here it is!

Cliffy B is called to the stage, I thought “Oh, here goes Gears of War 3” but no, he is announcing a Live Arcade game, fine by me. If only the game was that good (it wasn’t) and it was buggy! Near the end of the demo, the player was floating on the air where the destroyed boss have been. This is really embarrassing!

What’s this? Zombies? I thought I was watching a trailer for the upcoming Dead Rising 2. The sound effects were just wrong, they were from Left 4 Dead. I thought that this was cheap from Capcom. But wait a second, it’s Left 4 Dead 2!!! For a November 17th release. I have a mixed reaction here. This is definitely a must buy. And I think I will be buying it, when it’s released. But this got me worried over the future support for Left 4 Dead, the original one. If you look at Team Fortress 2, you know what to expect from Valve. But when you release a game every year, what will happen to the old game, will we see new levels (we haven’t seen any till now, and the SDK is still in beta, so no user-generated levels till now too. So, comes November 17th, will the original Left 4 Dead be dead? The game did offer very low value for money when it comes to levels and campaigns, but it offered incredible value for the fun factor of playing the same levels over and over again and again and each time you will have fun. I really want to see more from the original before I see a sequel. But if the mighty Valve chooses to grant us a sequel, let’s hope it’s for a reduced price for the current owners of L4D. And the trailer looked like it was in CGI, or they are using a new engine other than the Source Engine. The concept of chainsaws is great, but the one who is using it will simply be slow, how they are going to balance this for the remaining 3 team members to keep things moving fast? We will have to wait and see. Valve have the talent. I just wish they would announce Half-Life 2: Episode 3 and Portal 2 too. I am dying for this.

I hate the fact that Splinter Cell: Conviction is now a X360 exclusive. I still have to play Chaos Theory and Double Agent, the previous two games in the series, though. But I didn’t like the departure from the gameplay style of this new game. This was more Jason Bourne than the Sam Fisher that I liked from the first two games in the series. But I think, ultimately, UBISOFT is going to release this on the PC.

Next up, was Halo. I haven’t played Halo 3, so I don’t know how the fight ends, so I have morbid fear of having the game spoiled for me. But luckily there was no such thing. The gameplay footage of Halo 3: ODST was great. But I thought that it would be a team game in the manner of Star Wars: Republic Commando. Maybe it’s because the footage was early near the start of the game, so you haven’t met the members of your team yet. But it looks really promising, and after all, it has Halo on it, so it will sell like crazy, but Bungie makes great games.

The reveal of Halo: Reach confirms the rumors and here we have a game about the early days of Master Chief during the Fall of Reach which was told not in the previous games but rather in the novelization of the Halo universe in the novel, The Fall of Reach, which is considered the first of the 4 Halo novels. There were no further details other than a 2010 release date. A beta key will be included with copies of ODST. Good.

I don’t like racing games that much, so Froza 3 didn’t catch my attention.

Now, Alan Wake, that’s more like it. I am glad that the game is nearing release (Spring 2010) and it does look good. It has the same Silent Hill atmosphere but with a Max Payne style. But what was Alan’s flashlight? It’s beam was too powerful and highly focused!

The surprising Kojima announcement is discussed in the previous post, so I am not going to repeat the same stuff here.

As for the Xbox Live, Last.fm, Netflix, Facebook announcements, I simply couldn’t give a rat’s ass. Live is not available in my country, and until MS has the decency to respect my country, I am not interested in the service, besides, all this requires special internet broadband speeds that are simply science fiction where I live. As for Facebook, I am the site’s public enemy #1.

Now, let’s talk about the Natal Project. Natal? What’s wrong with Natalie? No, seriously… I love controllers. They provide accurate and responsive controls to all games, regardless of the genre, and I am not going to mention the magnificent keyboard and mouse combo. This new project is simply a camera that reads your body motion and translates it into commands for the X360 to integrate into the software. There is also voice recognition software that identifies the person and possibly, his/her emotions. The press conference showed some applications in both gaming and social Xbox Live activities. I am not going to talk about the Live activities, as simply I won’t use it and I won’t have a video chat with my friend to help me choose what dress to wear! LOL!

The showed games were all concepts with nothing that is actually in production. Both Stephen Spielberg and Peter Moylenaux (of Lionhead) made an appearance and discussed the future capabilities of the device. Moylenaux even made a concept project about a virtual boy called Milo that the player can interact with, emotionally.

Now, I may seem like a backward, stone age person, but I don’t like this new direction. About the Milo thing, first, it will be a world of hell to the developer to record all the pre-recorded audio for the virtual character, because voice generation software can’t simply simulate human emotions. Now add the needed animations and facial expressions and you will understand what I mean. Besides, didn’t you think that Milo was so close to HAL? I mean, it’s scary. And if I want something to talk to, I will get a real person, or I will simply talk to my cat, which is easier, and the little furball understands it all!

Don’t get me wrong. The technology is wonderful, and it has an edge over the Wii, namely the graphical power of the X360, and also over similar PS3 stuff like the Singstar camera. But what this technology needs is careful implementation into games. When the Wii was announced, it was praised as a game changer for the console market and as a revolution (the old name for the Wii was the Nintendo Revolution, back in 2005) in the video game industry. Now after almost 3 years of being in the market, the number of really imaginative games that took advantage of the technology are less than 10. The rest are mediocre at best.

So, if you want to sell me this technology, show me its integration into games, good games, and I am sold. But until then, it’s a nice gimmick.

Finally, I would like to illustrate my stance about controllers to my dear friend Falcon. I think that controllers are here to stay. They are wonderful at what they do, and they work for everything. The new motion sensing techniques failed for the Wii and failed for the PS3 (miserably). Motion sensing can work for some games, but not all. Imagine playing a RTS with this, it’s useless. A fighting game like Street Fighter or Tekken, how the hell are you going to do the insane combos? Finally, it’s potentially disturbing. I know that you will accuse me of nice things regarding testosterone deficiency… But I won’t be comfortable playing a game like God of War or Manhunt with motion sensing. It’s very, very disturbing. Imagine doing the motion necessary to snap someone’s neck… That’s not why I am playing games. I don’t want this. Also, the transition of controlling in a game like Battlefield or GTA where there are on foot sections and others with vehicles. How can you motion control this? Or are you going to sacrifice vehicles and mounted turrets for mimicking firing an AK in a game. And imagine the disadvantage this is going to introduce in multiplayer games. If you are not fit or if you are sleepy and tired, then you are pwned! But I have to admit, playing a Star Wars game or a samurai game with this technology will be interesting.

I also would like to stress on something, everyone is so irritated that gaming needs a wider audience. I don’t agree. Gaming is a hobby that has its fans, not all people are gamers or capable of being gamers, so don’t punish the real gamers by forcing them to play using pathetically simple controls to please the non-gaming base. This is what Nintendo did with the Wii, they profited from the sales, but the real hardcore gamers got very, very few good games. The rest of the garbage are made for lonely mothers and grandmothers. I am not an elitist, but if the controller is the barrier that prevents these mindless masses from destroying my hobby, then I will protect the controller with everything I have got. Gaming is not a casual hobby, it’s something that you either have it or not. No body buys a digital SLR camera for $$$ and then complains that there are way too many controls on it and they need to be simplified like a point and shoot camera. Why didn’t he/she buy a simple camera from the start and saved him/herself the trouble, instead of forcing the industry to change itself to accommodate his/her needs, regardless of the real photographers who benefit from the added complexity?

Just think about it.

MS is not stupid, I just hope they do it right and not to chase a quick buck.

Finally… (no, really) we didn’t get Halo 3 for the PC, or Gears of War 2. This is just sad.

Monday, June 1, 2009

Metal Gear Solid: Rising

The Microsoft E3 2009 conference has just ended and Kojima has announced that the MGS franchise is coming to the X360. For the fanboy claims, MGS did appear on other platforms than those made by Sony. MGS: Integral appeared on the PC, MGS2: Substance appeared on the Xbox and PC and MGS: Twin Snakes appeared on the Gamecube. I am not counting the GameBoy version and the iPhone one. So, it’s not a Sony-franchise. OK? Capiche?

But what makes me puzzled is that how Kojima can make the game on the X360 when you know that MGS4 occupied a full Blu-Ray disc, to the extent that it wasn’t possible to include both the English and Japanese voices on the same disc. How is the game going to fit in regular DVDs? It’s either going multi-DVD or the game will simply have to sacrifice something. I don’t think Kojima is stupid enough to cut some of the stuff on the PS3 version to compensate. Oh yes, the game is multiplatform for sure. Who says? Me.

According to Kojima, the game will feature Raiden. But I am a bit suspicious about the change of the game subtitle from Tactical Espionage Action to Lightning Bolt Action. I don’t want a Devil May Cry-clone. I want a Metal Gear Solid game. MGS2, which also featured Raiden, was simply awesome, and the ninja parts were great, but it wasn’t the whole game.

I guess we will have to wait and see. The countdown on the Kojima’s Next page will end in about one and half hours. Soon enough.

As for MGS4 on the X360, I don’t think that it will come. And I am quoting the live blog of Gamespot about the MS conference, “So much for MGS4 on the X360”. End of the story.

Sunday, May 31, 2009

Star Trek (2009) Review

I have never been a fan of Star Trek. Make no mistake, I had nothing against it, it’s just the fact that I wasn’t exposed to it to either like it or hate it. All I knew about it is that it had deep lore and if you want to be called a real geek, then you must know about Star Trek, and by know I mean be a real fan.

So, you can guess that I went to see the new Star Trek movie with a real open mind, after all, I had no real prejudice to like it or hate it. The only Star Trek material I have previously seen was about less than 10 minutes from one Star Trek movie. I guess it was the Insurrection movie.

The movie is great. It’s not spectacular and it won’t make it in my top 10 list for sci-fi movies, but it was really great. The production values are top notch with really impressive CGI and special effects. The music was also great, from the Medal of Honour and The Incredibles composer, Michael Giacchino.

This was supposed to be a reboot for the series, and after the movie ended, it was clear that a sequel is already in the works (that’s how they roll in Hollywood). The story was good with its fair share of twists but I can’t say anything here as it will spoil a good part of the plot. What I can say, is that it tells the early story of the Star Trek universe (which I honestly know nothing about), and almost all of the characters featured in the movie are much older in the series and previous movies. I think I spotted some homage to the original characters, but since I don’t know anything about the universe, I can’t be sure.

Where I think the movie excelled is in this: it managed to grab my attention to the Star Trek universe. I am a complete newcomer and I really liked it there. And if I have the time, I think I will try to watch the previous material like the previous 10 movies and the series. I know that I have the desire, but I simply lack the time, after all, this is too much viewing. But I am willing.

I was impressed.

8/10

P.S. I am starting a new rating method for movies. 3 stars are for the plot, writing and direction. 3 more are for the audio/visual department (music, CGI and presentation). And finally, 3 for the acting. The remaining star is my secret power-up that I will give to a movie according to the way I see fit, that is, if it deserves it of course.

To practise this: For this movie, it gets 3/3 for audio/video, 2/3 for writing, 1/3 for acting (I didn’t like Captain Kirk, although I liked Sylar, err, I mean Spok. Besides, don’t expect good acting in big budget movies, except those made by Christopher Nolan!). I choose to gift it with the extra point for creating some enthusiasm for the franchise for a newcomer like me.

E3 2009: Expectations

A new year, a new E3 (that’s Electronic Entertainment Exhibition in case you don’t know, in such case, get the hell out of my e-space), and a new round of rumors, speculations and expectations. Here is the list of the things I am waiting for/suspecting/hoping to be in this year’s E3.

Please note that for multiplatform games, the PC is my platform of choice.

The Mighty PC:

  1. Halo 3 and Gears of War 2 are announced for the PC.
  2. Duke Nukem Forever lives!
  3. Half-Life 2: Episode 3 news. It’s about time, Valve!!! Also, how about Portal 2?!!!
  4. Mafia II, Bioshock 2, Batman: Arkham Asylum, StarCraft II, Assassin’s Creed II, Rage, Doom 4, Alan Wake, Max Payne 3, The Saboteur, Battlefield: Bad Company 2, Battlefield: Heroes, Splinter Cell: Conviction news/gameplay/release date.
  5. Modern Warfare 2 gameplay and details.
  6. Resident Evil 5 PC and Street Fighter IV PC details and release date, including system requirements!
  7. GTAIV DLC comes to the PC.
  8. Dead Space 2?
  9. Mass Effect 2. (Still have to play the first though)
  10. Aliens vs Predator reboot. Oh… The memories!
  11. Crysis 2. I mean, come on... I want to know what happened after the cliffhanger ending! But I don't want something that will tell me that my PC is crap.

PS3:

  1. Price cut.
  2. Price cut.
  3. Oh, a price cut!
  4. Kojima’s next game (Whatever the hell it is!)
  5. Team ICO’s next game. (see previous post)
  6. God of War III. (Zeus… Your days are numbered!)
  7. Heavy Rain: The Origami Killer.
  8. The new rumored slim PS3.
  9. Uncharted 2.
  10. MAG
  11. The next rumored Twisted Metal.
  12. LA Noire?
  13. Okami sequel?
  14. Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2

Xbox 360:

  1. Price cut.
  2. Halo 3: ODST
  3. Crackdown 2

Console-only multiplatform:

  1. Dante’s Inferno
  2. Wet
  3. Tekken 6
  4. Brutal Legend
  5. Army of Two 2
  6. Bayonetta... Just watch the new E3 trailer. It's Devil May Cry but with a chick and more bad-ass moves.

Wii:

  1. No More Heroes 2 and Red Steel 2
  2. Funny conference!

So, what do you think? Post your thoughts and expectations in the comments.


Update: Added Crackdown 2, Portal 2, Crysis 2, Bayonetta and Army of Two 2.

Thursday, May 21, 2009

Monday, May 11, 2009

The King is… Dead?

 

Always bet on Duke.

I was still hoping that someday I will see Duke saving babes from evil aliens. I think I saw the E3 2001 trailer in 2002 or so, and the moment I saw it, I told myself, “This is going to be awesome!”

Years passed, more years passed, and now, after 12 years from the initial announcement of the game… 3D Realms have closed shop for financial reasons. They still own the Duke IP (intellectual property) and their publisher, Take-Two, still holds publishing rights, but as far as everyone is concerned, now we may never see the game at all.

What makes Duke special? Well, he is the man. Duke Nukem 3D was one of my favourite games. I played it at friends’, in school (Oh yeah!) and on my PC and PS. I played the 3rd person PS games that came out and I even played the Manhattan Project side-scrolling game on the PC. I was really waiting. I am patient, very patient.

So, what’s in the future for Duke? This maybe the greatest publicity stunts ever and a month or so later we all get surprised with the game being released! Or some other company can buy the rights from the now defunct 3D Realms and finish the game and release it. And last but not least, this may be the true end of the Duke.

Hail to the King, baby…

In the past 4 or 5 days, I have seen screenshots, gameplay footage (leaked of course) and plot details than I have ever seen in all the past years. Make sure you head there and there. And if you want to really have a few big laughs, head over there and read about what happened in the 12 years of DNF development, including a pre-order receipt for the game!

Ooops, it seems that the leaked gameplay footage was pulled offline. But it’s available on Youtube. I am not going to host it here as it has some nudity in it. This is a family-safe blog!

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

An open letter to the BBC

I have written this in response to this article that I read today on the BBC website. I have filed an official complaint at their website, and to their praise, the procedure was trouble free.

Update: As of 11/5/2009, I still haven't received from them any reply. I don't think I ever will.


Dear BBC,


Regarding the article that you posted today about Egypt:


First of all, why is this news?! This is not posted as a BBC magazine article or an analysis of some sort by one of your excellent writers. This was posted news. I read it over and over and I am yet to see an informative thing about it. This is more of “propaganda machine” article than something I have come to expect from your prestigious company. The word BBC is associated in my mind with honesty and professionalism. Your news on the radio, TV and Internet gain my immediate trust and I value them more than any other news from any other source, whether it's local or international.


After reading the article I mentioned over and over, what is the writer trying to say? That Cairo lost its glamor and culture because we no longer have cabarets and pubs?! That we no longer have culture because belly dancing and alcohol consumption are being controlled? Is this what an entity as informed as the BBC refer to as culture? This is really a disgrace. I mean let me get this straight: You are claiming that Egypt is falling in the hands of extremists because it no longer has a Western nightlife? That we no longer have culture because our own culture is not compatible with your culture. Every nation has its own rules. Every religion has its own rules. The writer of your article needs to go to a library and look for an atlas to know that there are other countries in the world than his own, whatever and wherever that
is...


I just hope that any “trigger happy” person in charge of some Western nation doesn't read your article and then start a Holy Crusade to liberate us, poor Egyptians, and give us back the culture that you claim was taken from us by the fanatics, in the same manner that Democracy® and Freedom® were given to the Iraqis and the Afghans.


I have been a loyal reader, but not anymore...


Thanks BBC.

Sunday, February 15, 2009

The Road

I do like the "end of the world" scenarios a lot. They just spark my imaginations into countless "what if" scenarios. To the extent that on some crazy moments, I started thinking how I will fortify my house in the case of a zombie apocalypse! I am not joking. It makes a relaxing mental exercise. Try it someday.

I spent the greater parts of last November and December reading, watching and playing all sorts of stuff related to the apocalypse. The frenzy started with me reading Blindness during the last days of my exams... It made a great mood changer! Please read the last post to know what I thought of the novel (and its movie). Then I read the original 1950s novel I Am Legend, which I liked its 2008 movie adaptation a lot. After that I read the fantastic, breath-taking and mind-blowing The Road by Cormac McCarthy. And this reading session was concluded with one of Stephen King's best novels: The Stand. In this article I will be discussing The Road. I have already talked about Blindness, and God willing, I will write about the other 2 novels some other time.

During this frenzy, I watched a lot of apocalyptic and post-apocalyptic movies and played the wonderful demo of Left 4 Dead. I was also hoping to walk a bit on the barren wastelands of Washington DC in Fallout 3, but it never happened. But nothing in this grim time reached the heights of The Road, and here is why...

The Road is a 2006 novel by the American writer Cormac McCarthy. It won the Pulitzer Prize for Literature in 2007 and became a best seller. A movie adaptation is being made and will be released in 2009 starring Viggo Mortensen and Charlize Theron.

The novel follows a cataclysm whose nature is not mentioned at all in the whole novel. The events take place in North America in an unknown year and mostly about 10 years after the unknown cataclysm. A man and his son are trying to make escape the freezing north into the warmer south while heading east towards the ocean. Well, that's almost the whole story. But if you are not looking for events, but rather to an experience, then you will find plenty of this here. The story is incredibly grim and pessimistic. It will haunt you and personally I felt a huge psychological load on myself while I was reading it. The images are strong and memorable and the events in the novel so lifelike that it's really scary.

You never know what really happened. The sun is no longer visible from the dark clouds. All the plant and animal species are history. Food, fuel and clothes are no where to be found. Some people found out an alternate source for food: other humans. So you see, some people turned to cannibalism, capturing people and imprisoning them to eat them piece by piece. The fact that you never know what happened was an annoyance to a friend of mine that read the novel. But I see the opposite. It really means nothing to know what happened. In the first couple of years it might have been important, but after that, what's the point? The end is coming and no one can stop it. You just live long enough to see the next morning and that's all you dream of.

At first, I thought that this was too much, and I started making my thought protest as I did in Blindness, until I thought about it. 10 years is a lot of time. The survivors lost all their humanity if they have survived that long in a dying world. The man and his son are maybe the last of their kind. The man is of a dying breed and I thought that he must be some sort of a legend for his son. He tells his son stories about stuff that the boy never saw and never will. The boy never saw lots of things that we take for granted in our modern life. In one part of the novel, the man was trying to describe to his son what a cow was... The scene was so strong that it reminded me of a similar thing in Band of Brothers when a US soldier gave a little boy a piece of chocolate. The little boy took it while he looked a bit surprised. After taking a bite he started smiling. The little boy's father told the soldier that the boy never tasted chocolate before.

The trip of the man and his son across the dying American landscape with charred forests, ransacked houses, dead farms, derailed trains allowed me to reflect a bit about all the stuff that we can lose and that we already take for granted. For this sad couple, there was really no future. They are just living day to day with no long term goals. The boy asked his father what their long term goals were and the man was astonished to hear this sentence and asked the boy where he heard this before!

The man knows a lot of stuff and is a survivor, which is a given when you know that he stayed in that hell for so long, while doing his best to keep his son alive. He was underfed, cold and tired and in a constant danger of being eaten by the cannibals, but yet, his father did his best to keep him safe.

One of the strongest pictures that made its place in my memory is the picture of the man and his son walking together on the ever going Road while pushing their supermarket cart in front of them. It haunts me when I walk in the street. When I go to the supermarket. And when I think about the future.

This is one of the best novels that I have ever read in my life, and I think every adult should read it at some point in his/her life to know that we are living in a paradise and that in a blink of an eye, we can lose it all...

Saturday, January 31, 2009

Dissecting "Blindness"

I first heard about this novel from the movie by Fernando Mierles whom I have liked his work in Cidade de Deus (City of God). The movie was screened in Cannes 2008 and received very bad reviews from critics, so I thought about reading the book myself. It turned out that the book is by a Nobel Laurette called Jose Saramango.

A few pages into the novel and you realize that you are going to read something deep. At least that's what I felt. I am sorry but this discussion will contain spoilers, major spoilers, I assure you. So read if you are not interested in the novel or the movie or simply have read it before.

The novel follows the story of a group of people who lived in an unnamed city that had an epidemic of blindness. White blindness that is. The disease was highly infectious, so the government quarantined those who were infected or exposed to infection in an old mental asylum and surrounded it by army troops. The story takes place during the quarantine and *spoiler* after the destruction of the asylum and the escape of all the inmates. Among the people in the asylum was a woman who could see. She was the wife of an ophthalmologist who lost his sight, but she lied about her condition so that she could accompany him.

The novel is incredible in its strength and scope. I have never read anything that was remotely similar. But the last part of the novel felt as if I was reading a novelization of a zombie movie, like 28 Days Later or one of the Dead series of movies by George Romero. I didn't like this. Perhaps what I hated most in this novel is the cruelty of the writer. When people were thrown into the quarantine, the condition of their life was very harsh. There was no water, no lavatories, the food wasn't enough, everything was dirty and rotten. The soldiers guarding the infected were very easy going with the triggers of their rifles and a lot of the blind were shot by the guards who feared that they might get close and infect them. The blind were issued some rules that were repeated over loud speakers daily. Among the rules was that no external help will be provided to them, this includes medical help and medications. Also, if violence erupts inside the asylum, no one will interfere.

Most of the description we received was through the eyes of the doctor's wife. I forgot to say that there are no names in the novel. Not a single name. People are referred to with adjectives; like the doctor's wife, the man with the eye batch, the first blind man, the wife of the first blind man, the car thief, etc, etc. I thought it was weird at the beginning but it fit the mood, as, like I said, we saw things through the eyes of the seeing doctor's wife. And I think this is the way she identified all the people. According to a feature in them.

This is a dark and violent trip into the heart of humanity. The people degenerated into savagery and barbarism. With no one watching, they started to fight over the food, urinate and defecate everywhere, refuse to bury the dead who died in clashes with the soldiers. When the situation became worse and more and more people started going blind, the government threw into the asylum more and more numbers that the wards can fit. In total, there was about 250 blind persons in the asylum, that's when trouble happened, and this is where the novel lost me...

A group of thugs started to take all the food and require payment from all the other inmates to receive their food. When this happened, I thought "This will boil down to sex." Because in a community like this, money, gold and other riches simply have no value. The only things that will be valuable are medicine, food and services. And the writer didn't let me down, and this is where the novel turned barbaric. The thugs started asking for women, or no one will eat. People refused at first, then they succumbed and agreed. There was 6 wards in the asylum. The thugs occupied one, so that left five. They will start with each ward's women and then rotate. According to the doctor's wife who made a small expedition into the thugs ward, there was twenty of them.

I don't know how can people agree to this, even if it meant their death. To allow women to be raped so that the whole of the quarantined people can eat is an inhuman idea. How can any one accept this? Also the married people, including the doctor's wife, who could see!!!, did what was asked from them. This is just insane. The thugs had a single gun with them, and they were twenty, this leaves about 230 or so of the other inmates. Can't they storm the ward and kill the other thugs. Yes, there will be casualties, but compare this with the greater benefit and you can see the winning formula. Besides, a gun won't last forever, and the one who was firing it was blind for God's sake!!! But no, no one thought of that, and I, as a reader, had to endure scenes of brutal raping of women who couldn't see, by men who also couldn't see. This part of the novel shocked me like nothing I have ever read or seen in my life. When I was reading it, I was speechless and my face flushed and my heart started racing. It was brutal, really brutal. That's why I will NEVER recommend this book to anyone.

Then there was an uprising in the asylum (but when it was too late, why didn't it happen sooner than this?) and everything was destroyed.

Those who managed to escape were then shocked when they knew that the whole country was struck by the disease. Everyone was blind, and everything fell into anarchy. There was no law anymore, no police, no food, no running water, no electricity. People lived together in ground floors and in shops in groups and they went forging for food, in groups. They urinated and defecated everywhere in groups, and they died in groups. Dogs and cats started eating the corpses, the air was filled with the pungent odour of death and decay. It was the apocalypse. That's why I referred to this part as a zombie movie.

But all of this is nothing compared to the ending. This really blew things for me. People started seeing again... It's not clear if the infection was worldwide or not, but I think that that it was worldwide. If the whole world was living as it was described in the novel, then to start seeing again is simply a disaster. Can you imagine how can there be a leadership again? It will take people centuries to return back to what they were. It reminded me of the short story The Poison Belt by Sherlock Holmes creator, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. And if you think about it, I think some people started practicing cannibalism in some regions, but this is a speculation from my part.

You might think that I hated the novel. I really don't know what to think. The novel was very well written, with meticulous attention to details. But what bothered me was the cruelty. There is way too much cruelty in here, for no reason. We could have just fast forwarded from the point of the appearance of the thugs to the destruction of the asylum, without having to endure all the pain and misery.

Also, religion is almost totally neglected in this novel. Whenever people face problems, they tend to be religious and start believing in the presence of a Higher Force and start praying, each according to his/her belief. If this happens in day to day activities, why won't it happen at the end of the world. The religious themes have to be taken carefully into consideration. But its absence here didn't shock me as its absence in On the Beach.

The writer didn't specify a certain country or a certain ethnic group, even the religious part at the end was also non specific. I think the writer wanted his novel to be universal. A universal account of a plague that could have caused the end of the world. I think the thugs were a symbol for non democratic governments: they just came and started taking all the wealth into their hands and abusing the resources for their own benefit. The blind in the quarantine are the helpless people that are governed by such regimes (but in my book, it doesn't relieve them from the responsibility of what happened in exchange for food). But what I fail to see its symbolism is the blindness itself. Is it a sign for the fall of false charade that people are keeping because everyone else is looking at them. I have read similar novels that dealt with this subject like Lord of the Flies and Deliverance. Or is it simply a sign of the fall of laws and rules, and that's what is keeping the savagery of man at bay? Or is it simply just a thing for the plot that has no deeper meaning? I think it's the first one. When you can't see what you do and people can't see what you are doing, then those without strong inner rules will simply lose it. Lose everything and degenerate back into animals, where survival is the most important and vital thing.

The woman who can see is the link between us and those living zombies. She is there so that we can identify them. Why she never lost her eye sight is not explained in the novel. Although she could see, yet it kept this matter a secret and endured everything that the other endured, from hunger to rape. Her husband is someone who fooled me. At the beginning of the novel I liked him. He was the sound of reason in the beginning of the quarantine, but then I saw that he was just full of air. He didn't stand for his wife to protect her from the sexual abuse, no even worse, when they were "preparing" for the abuse, he cheated on her when chance presented herself. I don't know how can he allow himself this after everything his wife did for him. She took care of him, cleaned him up from his own filth and gave him the higher position that he occupied in the ward where they lived.

Fernando is a great director. His work in Cidade of Deus and The Constant Gardener is a living proof for this, but the critical opinion for this movie was very low. Critics hated it and I understand why. I have no idea how he will portray some of the scenes in the novel, from the orgies to the streets full of excreta to the rendering of hundreds of people on screen who are acting like blind people. The movie was released in the US months ago, and was, as expected, a box office flop. The movie has a very strong cast with Juliane Moore doing the role of the doctor's wife. I know that it will be painful, but I am looking forward to seeing it.

UPDATE: I have seen the movie. Like the novel, I can't recommend it. Lots of the novel didn't make it into the movie, especially the city parts. I didn't get the huge scope and magnitude of the cataclysm as I did in the novel. In the novel it felt like the apocalypse. You felt desperate. I am not sure if it's humanly possible to film these things. And I am also not sure if not being faithful to the novel was a good or a bad thing, considering that I didn't really fall in love with the novel.

I hope you liked this article, dear reader, and I am sorry for the spoilers.

Saturday, May 10, 2008

Happy Birthday, REX

My good old PC, Metal Gear REX is five years old today... I can't believe it! I bought it on the same day five years ago, but kept it in its package for another month till I had finished my General Secondary school exams. Although I chose the specs my self, I had someone else build it for me... I redeemed myself with building Arsenal Gear with my own hands.

We have a lot of good memories together. We shared lots of good games, movies and music on it. The first game that I installed on it was GTAIII, even though I had already beaten it then, but I wanted to see how it would run with all the settings on high! The last game that I installed on it was Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, which ran fine, but not with all the eye candy that I am seeing now on Arsenal Gear.

Metal Gear REX started its life with these specs:
  • Intel Pentium 4 2.4 GHz, 512 KB L2 cache, Northwood Core 120 nm, Socket 478
  • Gigabyte 8IR2003 running the Intel 865 chipset with built-in Realtek AC'97 sound codec
  • Manli GeForce 4 MX 440 AGP 4X 128 MB (now in Shagohod, my oldest surviving system)
  • 512 MB DDR-RAM 266 MHz (2x256 MB)
  • 120 GB Western Digital HDD 7200 RPM
  • Floppy Disk Drive (KIA)
  • ASUS 52X CD-ROM (now in Shagohod)
  • Sony 52x24x52x CD burner
  • 17" LG CRT

Throughout the years, REX received the following upgrades and/or replacements:
  • Intel Processor heatsink and fan (replacement)
  • Realtek 8139 PCI Network Interface Card (add-on)
  • Sony 16X DVD-ROM (add-on) (now KIA)
  • XFX GeForce 6600 128 MB AGP 8X (running as AGP 4X due to motherboard limitation) (replacement)
  • BenQ DW1640 DVD burner (add-on)
  • Kingston 512 MB DDR-RAM 400 MHz (running as 266 MHz) (add-on)
  • A VIA-based PCI-to-USB 2.0 card (add-on)

Not to count 4 power supplies, 5 mice, countless IDE cables, 60 and 80 mm system fans, 1 GPU cooler for the 6600 and 1 GPU slot cooler.

I am still proud that the keybaord that came with REX is still functioning properly (I am typing this from it). The same goes for the outstanding LG CRT.

I hope that you remain alive for many years, my dear REX. We still can learn a lot of things from each other.

He is running now Windows XP along with Ubuntu 8.04.